Aavishkar Google Ads Case Study: 90% Growth in Qualified Traffic

Performance Marketing Case Study

How growth.cx Helped Aavishkar Launch Google Ads From Zero and Generate 200+ Qualified Manufacturing Leads at 52–65% Lower Cost Per Lead

avishkar-page-image

200+

Qualified leads - from a standing start, no prior paid campaigns

90%

Growth in qualified traffic, Phase 1 to Phase 2

52–65%

CPL reduction, Phase 1 to Phase 2

About Aavishkar

Aavishkar is a global leader in oral strip manufacturing fast-dissolving oral delivery solutions for the nutraceutical, wellness, and pharmaceutical industries. It has a 220,000 sq. ft. manufacturing facility and annual capacity exceeding 2 billion strips. The company combines large-scale production with in-house R&D, serving brand owners and private-label partners worldwide.

Pain Points Faced by Aavishkar

  • No prior Google Ads presence. Zero historical data, zero audience signal, zero campaign learnings to build from.

  • Minimal visibility on the commercial keywords procurement managers and brand owners search before reaching out to a manufacturer.

  • A major industry event is approaching, with no paid acquisition channel in place to capture the pre-event spike in buyer search activity.

  • Aggressive, established global competitors already bidding on the same commercial terms. Aavishkar would be entering the auction with no track record against players who'd been running for years

  • Strong manufacturing and R&D credentials with no digital channel translating them into qualified inbound inquiries.

Business Type :

B2B Manufacturing

Offices :

Hyderabad, India

Ideal Customer Profile :

Regions: US

Buyer Persona: Healthcare and nutraceutical brand owners, pharmaceutical companies, private-label wellness brands, procurement managers, product development teams, distributors

Domains: Healthcare, Nutraceuticals, Pharmaceuticals, Wellness, Manufacturing

Our Observations & Challenges

  • No existing landing pages built for paid traffic. Every click would have landed on the general website with no conversion path.
  • No previous campaign data to inform keyword bids, audience targeting, or budget allocation.
  • No prior signal on which international markets would actually convert, despite a global ICP.
  • A hard external deadline (the industry event) that ruled out the slower, data-gathering ramp-up a cold-start account would normally get.
  • Building product-level keyword and landing page infrastructure from scratch across multiple manufacturing categories. But no historical performance to guide initial structure
  • Entering a competitive global auction against established manufacturers with years of campaign history and standing budgets, while Aavishkar's account had none.
  • Compressing the typical learning-phase timeline to have qualified visibility in place before the event, rather than the usual multi-month build.

Our Strategy & Execution

Phase 1 - Foundation & Launch

  • Built the account from zero: Product-level ad groups for private-label manufacturing, contract manufacturing, and category-specific search terms. Each mapped to a dedicated landing page.
  • Launched with a broader keyword mix deliberately. It has no historical data yet to identify which exact terms would convert.
  • Set up tracking and conversion measurement from day one to start generating the performance baseline.

Phase 2 - Optimization

  • Used phase 1 data to shift from broad-match to exact-match, high-commercial-intent keywords. The change that drove the 90% jump in qualified traffic
  • Reallocated budget toward the international markets phase 1 data showed were actually converting. The main lever behind the 52–65% CPL drop.
  • Rebid aggressively for top-of-page visibility to land the brand in top ad positions ahead of the industry event
  • Rewrote ad copy to lead with manufacturing scale, R&D capability, and private-label expertise.

What worked?

  • 01

    Launching with structure, not guesswork Product-level ad groups and dedicated landing pages from day one meant Phase 1 data was usable.

  • 02

    Exact-match keywords once data existed The single biggest driver of the Phase 1→2 traffic growth. Converting early broad-match learnings into qualified buyer traffic

  • 03

    Reallocating budget to proven markets

    Once Phase 1 showed which regions converted, concentrating spend there is what moved CPL down 52–65%.
  • 04

    Visibility-first bidding ahead of the event Secured top-3 positions on schedule despite having no prior account history.

What didn't work?

  • Broad-match keywords, while necessary in Phase 1 to gather initial signals with zero historical data, produced lower-quality traffic than the account could sustain. This confirming the shift to exact-match in Phase 2 was the right call.

  • Early generic ad copy underperformed once Phase 1 data showed. Buyers responded more to specific manufacturing credentials that were addressed in the Phase 2 rewrite.

End Result

Qualified traffic
Phase 1 (Launch): Baseline established
Phase 2 (Optimized): +90%
Cost per lead
Phase 1 (Launch): Baseline established
Phase 2 (Optimized): −52–65%
Qualified leads generated
Phase 1 (Launch):-
Phase 2 (Optimized): 200+ total
Top-3 ad position, core commercial keywords
Phase 1 (Launch):Not yet achieved
Phase 2 (Optimized): Achieved ahead of industry event

Unlock the Growth Potential of your Company

Hop on a call

Case Studies